mall map




visit our web sites

auditing web sites

other web sites

job opportunities

benchmark with us
tool box
Audit Reporting

Most companies practice a somewhat tired, "left-handed, right-handed" tradition of delivering separate, audit reports to the audit committee. One from the chief audit executive and one from the lead partner of the public accounting firm. However, most audit committee's are interested in the collective assurance received from these providers and a more integrated form of communication is most effective in terms of helping the audit committee to understand matters in their proper context.

The objectives of external audit firms today are heavily skewed towards providing assurance toward the reliability of a company's external financial reporting, whereas internal auditors tend to delve further into assurance directed at the effectiveness and efficiency of a company's processes and/or its compliance with applicable laws and regulations. This division of labor may be entirely appropriate in terms of optimizing audit resources, given the respect and expectations typically accorded these assurance providers, but the enterprise-wide control objectives and risk framework should be commonly understood and periodically agreed upon with the audit committee. In fact, this common understanding can lead to effective and efficient integration of assurance plans and delivery of integrated audit reporting to an audit committee.

 


Auditor Utilization

Our guidance in determining auditor utilization is based on the concept of empowered design, maintenance and evaluation of internal controls. Simply stated, our first preference is to encourage self-assurance over internal controls. But, other resources are also available; including, VF Internal Audit and external assurance providers. Thus, assurance resources available to our customers can be viewed as depicted below.


There are several factors which must be taken into consideration when determining the appropriate deployment of assurance resources. For instance, the degree of independence sought to evaluate the internal control issue at hand must be considered.

Often there are timing and staffing constraints that come into play as the demands on available resources are great and continue to grow. Similarly, cost is a factor that must be weighed in determining the resources most appropriate to use.

Continuity and ownership must also be carefully considered. Certain acute transaction activities warrant close, ongoing assurance delivered by the initiators of such activities. In other highly complex areas, continuity of assurance is critical due to the challenges associated with achieving effective knowledge transfers.

Finally, the level of expertise available must be assessed. Certain issues naturally lend themselves to utilizing resources where specific subject matter knowledge is needed.




Auditing Retail
A surprise to many is the fact that while VF Corporation manufactures and markets to the retailing community, we also operate retail operations, VF Outlets, Nautica, The North Face, Vans, Kipling, Napapirji, Lee, Seven For All Mankind, lucy, etc. located around the world.

The retailing process connotes homogeneous, repetitive activities. Such an environment lends itself to a systemic assurance solution. Rather than employing battalions of auditors to "conquer" each and every retail site, we have found it possible to embed assurance within the retailing environment. If one designs a retail internal control model, management and staff may obtain much of their own assurance by performing self-reviews against the "model." The main areas reviewed to gain assurance as to the adequacy of internal controls over VF's retail operations are: store compliance with established polices and procedures, revenue, cash management, inventory management, risk management, operations, and human resources.

 

 

 

 

 

 


Achieving Balanced Assurance



Metrics to Assess Audit Performance

VF Internal Audit has carefully crafted certain metrics which we strive to meet each year. The activities we choose to monitor relate to our Service Principles - Value, Speed and Professionalism.

There are three categories to our performance measurement system. The first category entails a survey taken with our Customers. Our customer satisfaction with Value, Speed and Professionalism is the most important barometer we have in measuring the success of our group.

The second category that we monitor is comprised of certain Internal Success Factors established for our department; such as benefit opportunities identified as a % of internal audit cost (Value), cycle time (Speed) and audit utilization, overtime and budget to actual results (Professionalism). We also conduct Self-Assessments of Value, Speed and Professionalism at the completion of each internal audit.

Sample Internal Success Factors

Goal
Value

Value at Risk - The aggregate benefit opportunity identified in the internal audits and agreed to by the customers.

2x Internal Audit Budget
Speed Report Cycle Time - This measurement is an overall barometer of the efficiency with which IA is completing reviews. It measures the amount of time it takes, in days, to report upon a review. Measured from the date fieldwork ends to the date the final report is issued. All audits that have been started and completed in a current year are included in the metric. 21 Days
Professionalism Auditor Utilization- Measures how IA management is balancing the department's responsibility of providing internal control assurance to VF's management and Board of Directors, while engaging in initiatives to improve the department's long-term effectiveness. This metric is calculated by dividing the hours reported by the auditors by the standard hours available.

70%




  Actual to Budget Results- This metric compares actual costs for the IA department compared to the approved current year budget. 90 - 100%
Overtime Load- The amount of overtime incurred by auditors as a percentage of standard hours. 0-9%

The third category that we monitor is comprised of input received from our own associates in VF Internal Audit. Two times per year an anonymous survey is conducted with all associates in VF Internal Audit to assess their views on our achievement of Value, Speed and Professionalism. The input from our own associates serves as very meaningful input toward shaping our annual objectives.

360 degree Assessment
Assessment Criteria

Strongly
Agree

Agree

Partially
Agree

Disagree

 
4
3
2
1
1) Management views Internal Audit as important to VF's future success.

2) Important contributions are made by Internal Audit to VF.

3) Internal Audit is providing high quality service to VF's businesses.
4) Internal Audit is highly effective in addressing relevant assurance needs of VF.
5) Internal Audit renders fair and accurate assessments.
6) VF Internal Audit conducts its activities efficiently.
7) Developments in VF Internal Audit are communicated on a timely basis.
8) Planning, performance and wrap-up of internal audits is designed for efficient execution.
9) VF Internal Audit conducts its activities professionally.
10) The career interests of VF Internal Auditors receive strong support.