Audit Reporting
Most companies practice a somewhat tired, "left-handed, right-handed" tradition
of delivering separate, audit reports to the audit committee. One from the chief
audit executive and one from the lead partner of the public accounting firm. However,
most audit committee's are interested in the collective assurance received
from these providers and a more integrated form of communication is most effective in terms of helping the audit committee to understand matters in their proper context.
The objectives of external audit firms today are heavily skewed towards
providing assurance toward the reliability of a company's external financial reporting,
whereas internal auditors tend to delve further into assurance directed at
the effectiveness and efficiency of a company's processes and/or its compliance
with applicable laws and regulations. This division of labor may be entirely appropriate in terms of optimizing audit resources,
given the respect and expectations typically accorded these assurance
providers, but the enterprise-wide control objectives and risk framework
should be commonly understood and periodically agreed upon with the audit committee. In fact, this common understanding can lead to effective and efficient
integration of assurance plans and delivery of integrated audit reporting
to an audit committee.

Auditor Utilization
Our guidance in determining auditor utilization is based on the concept
of empowered design, maintenance and evaluation of internal controls.
Simply stated, our first preference is to encourage self-assurance over
internal controls. But, other resources are also available; including, VF Internal Audit
and external assurance providers. Thus, assurance resources available
to our customers can be viewed as depicted below.

There are several factors which must be taken into consideration when
determining the appropriate deployment of assurance resources. For instance,
the degree of independence sought to evaluate
the internal control issue at hand must be considered.
Often there are timing and staffing constraints that come into
play as the demands on available resources are great and continue to grow.
Similarly, cost is a factor that must be weighed in determining
the resources most appropriate to use.
Continuity and ownership must also be carefully considered. Certain
acute transaction activities warrant close, ongoing assurance delivered
by the initiators of such activities. In other highly complex areas, continuity
of assurance is critical due to the challenges associated with achieving
effective knowledge transfers.
Finally, the level of expertise available must be assessed.
Certain issues naturally lend themselves to utilizing resources where
specific subject matter knowledge is needed.
Auditing Retail
A surprise to many is the fact that while VF Corporation manufactures and markets to the retailing community, we also operate retail operations, VF Outlets, Nautica, The North Face, Vans, Kipling, Napapirji, Lee, Seven For All Mankind, lucy, etc. located around the world.

The retailing process connotes homogeneous, repetitive activities. Such
an environment lends itself to a systemic assurance solution. Rather than
employing battalions of auditors to "conquer" each and every
retail site, we have found it possible to embed assurance within the retailing
environment. If one designs a retail internal control model, management
and staff may obtain much of their own assurance by performing self-reviews against the "model." The main areas reviewed to gain assurance as to the adequacy of internal controls over VF's retail operations are: store compliance with established polices and procedures, revenue, cash management, inventory management, risk management, operations, and human resources.
Achieving Balanced Assurance


Metrics to Assess Audit Performance
VF Internal Audit has carefully crafted certain metrics which we strive
to meet each year. The activities we choose to monitor relate to our
Service Principles - Value, Speed
and Professionalism.
There are three categories to our performance measurement system. The
first category entails a survey taken with our Customers.
Our customer satisfaction with Value,
Speed and Professionalism
is the most important barometer we have in measuring the success of our group.
The second category that we monitor is comprised of certain Internal Success Factors established for our department;
such as benefit opportunities identified as a % of internal audit
cost (Value), cycle time (Speed)
and audit utilization, overtime and budget to actual results (Professionalism).
We also conduct Self-Assessments
of Value, Speed
and Professionalism
at the completion of each internal audit. |
Sample Internal Success Factors |
|
|
|
Goal |
| Value
|
Value at Risk - The aggregate benefit opportunity identified
in the internal audits and agreed to by the customers. |
2x Internal Audit Budget |
| Speed |
Report Cycle Time - This measurement
is an overall barometer of the efficiency with which IA is completing
reviews. It measures the amount of time it takes, in days, to report
upon a review. Measured from the date fieldwork ends to the date the
final report is issued. All audits that have been started and completed
in a current year are included in the metric. |
21 Days |
| Professionalism |
Auditor Utilization- Measures how
IA management is balancing the department's responsibility of providing
internal control assurance to VF's management and Board of Directors,
while engaging in initiatives to improve the department's long-term
effectiveness. This metric is calculated by dividing the hours reported
by the auditors by the standard hours available.
|
70%
|
| |
Actual to Budget Results- This metric compares actual costs for
the IA department compared to the approved current year budget. |
90 - 100% |
|
Overtime Load- The amount of overtime
incurred by auditors as a percentage of standard hours. |
0-9% |
The third category that we monitor is comprised of input received from our own associates in VF Internal Audit. Two times per year an anonymous survey is conducted with all associates in VF Internal Audit to assess their views on our achievement of Value, Speed and Professionalism. The input from our own associates serves as very meaningful input toward shaping our annual objectives.
| 360 degree Assessment |
| Assessment Criteria |
Strongly
Agree |
Agree
|
Partially
Agree |
Disagree
|
| |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| 1) Management views Internal
Audit as important to VF's future success. |
|
|
|
|
|
2) Important contributions are made by Internal Audit to VF. |
|
|
|
|
| 3) Internal Audit is providing high quality
service to VF's businesses. |
|
|
|
|
| 4) Internal Audit is highly effective
in addressing relevant assurance needs of VF. |
|
|
|
|
| 5) Internal Audit renders fair and accurate
assessments. |
|
|
|
|
| 6) VF Internal Audit conducts its activities
efficiently. |
|
|
|
|
| 7) Developments in VF Internal Audit are
communicated on a timely basis. |
|
|
|
|
| 8) Planning, performance and wrap-up of
internal audits is designed for efficient execution. |
|
|
|
|
| 9) VF Internal Audit conducts its activities
professionally. |
|
|
|
|
| 10) The career interests of VF Internal
Auditors receive strong support. |
|
|
|
|
|